Anatomy & Surgery: A love hate relationship

Haadia Ali; Sophia Shahid; Javeria Noor; Bahadur Baloch

doi:10.53685/jshmdc.v3i1.103

Authors

Haadia Ali Final year MBBS Student, Lahore Medical & Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan
Sophia Shahid 3rd year MBBS Student, Fatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan
Javeria Noor Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Anatomy, University of Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
Bahadur Baloch Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Fatima Memorial Medical & Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53685/jshmdc.v3i1.103

Abstract

Introduction: Anatomy is still taught in medical schools as a basis for studying pathophysiology and surgery. Lack of integration of basic and clinical disciplines reduced teaching hours, and poor teaching methodologies have a significant effect on anatomical knowledge and medical education standards.

Objectives: To evaluate the perspectives of undergraduate students of MBBS, fresh MBBS graduates, teaching faculty of anatomy, and consultants on the importance and reconstruction of the anatomy curriculum.

Materials & Methods: A total of 600 subjects participated in this cross-sectional study. A feedback form was used to collect data regarding time allocation, clinical relevance, integration, and clear viewpoints in basic histology, embryology, and gross anatomy. The form included free text, binomial, and 5-point Likert scale replies.

Results: Analysis of the results revealed that all stakeholders universally preferred integrated anatomy teaching throughout the academic years of medical school instead of demanding block during the early two years. According to the study, students experienced inadequacies in their anatomical knowledge when they started their clinical training.

Conclusion: This study contributes further to the ongoing discussions in anatomical sciences education by revealing that new doctors believe that anatomical instruction should be prioritized regardless of their career goals.

References

Peeler J, Bergen H, Bulow A. Musculoskeletal anatomy education: evaluating the influence of different teaching and learning activities on medical students’ perception and academic performance. Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger. 2018; 219: 44-50. doi:10.1016/j.aanat. 2018.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2018.05.004

Philippe S, Souchet AD, Lameras P, Petridis P, Caporal J, Coldeboeuf G, et al. Multimodal teaching, learning, and training in virtual reality: a review and case study. Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware. 2020; 2(5): 421-442. doi: 10.1016/j.vrih.2020.07.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vrih.2020.07.008

Ahmad K, Khaleeq T, Hanif U, Ahmad N. Addressing the failures of undergraduate anatomy education: Dissecting the issue and innovating a solution. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020; 61: 81-84. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2020.1 2.0 24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.024

Akeel MA. Exploring students’ understanding of structured practical anatomy. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2021; 16(3): 318-327.doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed. 2020.12.00 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.12.006

Singh V, Kharb P. A paradigm shift from teaching to learning gross anatomy: a meta-analysis of implications for instructional methods. J. Anat. Soc. India. 2013; 62(1): 84-89. doi:10.1016/S0003-2778(13)80019-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2778(13)80019-6

Huynh N, Burgess A, Wing L, Mellis C. Anatomy by Whole Body Dissection as an Elective: Student Outcomes. J Surg Educ. 2021; 78(2): 492-501. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.07.041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.07.041

Cottam WW. Adequacy of medical school gross anatomy education as perceived by certain postgraduate residency programs and anatomy course directors. Clin Anat. 1999; 12(1): 55-65. doi:10.1002/(SICI)10982353(1999)12:1<55:AID -CA8>3.0.CO;2-O. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1999)12:1<55::AID-CA8>3.0.CO;2-O

Estai M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review. Ann Anat. 2016; 208: 151-157.doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2016.02. 010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2016.02.010

Zhang JF, Zilundu PL, Zhou L, Guo GQ. Supplementary Regional Anatomy teaching by surgeons enhances medical students' mastery of anatomical knowledge and positively impacts their choice of future career. J Surg Educ. 2020;77(5): 1113-1120.doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2020. 03.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.03.016

Moxham BJ, Hennon H, Lignier B, Plaisant O. An assessment of the anatomical knowledge of laypersons and their attitudes towards the clinical importance of gross anatomy in medicine. Ann Anat. 2016; 208: 194-203. doi:10.1016/j.aanat. 2016. 06.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2016.06.001

Moxham BJ, Shaw H, Crowson R, Plaisant O. The future of clinical anatomy. Eur J Anat. 2011; 15(1): 29-46.

O’Keeffe GW, Davy S, Barry DS. Radiologist’s views on anatomical knowledge amongst junior doctors and the teaching of anatomy in medical curricula.Ann Anat. 2019; 223: 70-76. doi:10. 1016/ j.aa nat.2019.01.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2019.01.011

Triepels CPR, Koppes DM, Van Kuijk SM, Popeijus HE, Lamers WH, Van Gorp T, et al. Medical students’ perspective on training in anatomy. Ann Anat. 2018; 217: 60-65.doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2018.0 1.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2018.01.006

AlSaggaf S, Ali SS, Ayuob NN, Eldeek BS, El-Haggagy A. A model of horizontal and vertical integration of teaching on the cadaveric heart. Ann Anat. 2010; 192(6): 373-377. doi: 10.1016/ j.aanat.2010.06.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2010.06.005

Asakuma M, Komeda K, Yamamoto M, Shimizu T, Iida R, Taniguchi K, Inoue Y, Hirokawa F, Hayashi M, Okuda J, Kondo Y. A concealed “Natural Orifice”: umbilicus anatomy for minimally invasive surgery. Surgical Innovation. 2019; 26(1): 46-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350618797619

Clarke R, George D. Medical students’ perspective–the role of technology in Anatomy teaching: striking the right balance. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020; 11: 333-337. doi: 10.2147/ AMEP.S240150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S257161

Berkhout JJ, Helmich E, Teunissen PW, van der Vleuten CP, Jaarsma AD. Context matters when striving to promote active and lifelong learning in medical education. Med Educ. 2018; 52(1): 34-44. doi: 10.1111/medu.13463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13463

Bernstein DA. Does active learning work? A good question, but not the right one. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. 2018; 4(4): 290-293. doi:10.1037/stl0000124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000124

Khan H, Asif M, Kumari D, Jiskani AR, Kirmani F, Tariq AB, et al. Retention of Anatomy knowledge: during clerkship. EC Clinical and Experimental Anatomy. 2020; 3(3): 1-5.

Singh R, Shane Tubbs R, Gupta K, Singh M, Jones DG, Kumar R. Is the decline of human anatomy hazardous to medical education /profession?—A review. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015; 37(10): 1257-1265. doi: 10.1007/s0 027 6-015-1507-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1507-7