Towards a culture of ethical engagement of artificial intelligence in research

Authors

  • Noor-i-Kiran Naeem Department of Medical Education, ABWA Medical College, Faisalabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53685/jshmdc.v6i2.415

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, Ethics, Research Practices, Publications, Healthcare Professionals, Barriers, Reflective Practices

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the research process by reshaping how knowledge is generated, analyzed, and communicated. While AI enhances efficiency and opens new possibilities, it also introduces ethical challenges of authorship, accountability, bias, and trust. This paper emphasizes the need to move beyond compliance with policies toward building a culture of ethical engagement. Such a culture integrates ethics within scholarly identity and institutional practices through awareness, reflexivity, transparency, and inclusivity. Researchers must disclose and reflect on their use of AI tools, while institutions, journals, and funders share responsibility for ensuring literacy, fairness, and accountability. Embedding ethical reflection into training, peer review, and reward systems can help shift behavior from rule-following to genuine commitment. Developing a culture of ethical engagement ensures that the use of AI in research remains grounded in human integrity, critical judgment, and social responsibility.

References

Salman HA, Ahmad MA, Ibrahim R, Mahmood J. Systematic analysis of generative AI tools integration in academic research and peer review. Online J Commun Media Technol. 2025; 15(1): e202502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/15832

Maddali MM. Pro: Artificial Intelligence in Manuscript Writing: Advantages of Artificial Intelligence-Based Manuscript Writing to the Authors. Ann Card Anaesth. 2025; 28(2): 198-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_6_25

United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination (UNSCEB). Principles for the ethical use of artificial intelligence in the UN system. United Nations; 2022. Available from: https://unsceb.org/principles-ethical-use-artificial-intelligence-united-nations-system. Accessed 18 Oct 2025

Eacersall D, Pretorius L, Smirnov I. Navigating ethical challenges in generative AI-enhanced research: The ETHICAL framework for responsible generative AI use. J App Learn Teach. 2024.

Rahwan I, Cebrian M, Obradovich N, Bongard J, Bonnefon JF, Breazeal C, et al. Machine behaviour. Nature. 2019; 568(7753): 477-486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1138-y

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). COPE position statement: Authorship and AI tools. Committee on Publication Ethics; 2023. Available from: https://publicationethics.org. Accessed 26 Oct 2025.

Ocampo L, Aro JL, Evangelista SS, Maturan F, Yamagishi K, Mamhot D, et al. Research productivity for augmenting the innovation potential of higher education institutions: An interpretive structural modeling approach and MICMAC analysis. J Open Innov Technol Mark Complex. 2022; 8(3): 148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030148

Downloads

Published

12/26/2025

How to Cite

[1]
Naeem, N.- i-K. 2025. Towards a culture of ethical engagement of artificial intelligence in research. Journal of Shalamar Medical & Dental College - JSHMDC. 6, 2 (Dec. 2025), 69–70. DOI:https://doi.org/10.53685/jshmdc.v6i2.415.